Environmental Health News

What's Working

  • Garden Mosaics projects promote science education while connecting young and old people as they work together in local gardens.
  • Hope Meadows is a planned inter-generational community containing foster and adoptive parents, children, and senior citizens
  • In August 2002, the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Board voted to ban soft drinks from all of the district’s schools

#455 - The Big Problems -- Part 4: Controlling Corporations, 16-Aug-1995

A Pennsylvania environmental group has taken action to revoke the
corporate charters of two major American corporations --WMX
Technologies (formerly Waste Management, Inc.), the giant waste hauler,
and CSX, a large railroad and ocean shipping company.[1]

The Community Environmental Defense League (CELDF) of Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania [Thomas Linzey, president; phone: 717-545-0124], in June
petitioned the attorneys general of Delaware and West Virginia, asking
them to revoke the corporate charters of WMX and CSX.

A corporate charter is a piece of paper issued by the authority of
state legislatures to groups of people, giving them the privilege of
doing business as a "corporation." The benefits of the corporate form
are many:

** If a corporation causes harm, the liability of individual investors
is limited by law;

** Because investors are numerous and scattered, whereas managers are
few and focused, managers and boards of directors control a great deal
of money, and therefore a great deal of power, often answerable to no

** Corporations can own other corporations, which can, in turn, own
other corporations, thus making it very difficult, or impossible, to
trace ownership and responsibility for particular corporate actions;

** Because corporations can grow large (often much larger than any
state government), in a dispute with government, they can field an army
of attorneys and other specialists who can overwhelm the opposition,
leading to an accommodation (often called a "consent decree," in which
a fine is levied with no admission of guilt) rather than an aggressive
prosecution by government;

** Corporations, particularly those with overseas subsidiaries, can
often evade taxes by fancy footwork in the bookkeeping department
(which may be perfectly legal);

** In court proceedings, corporations enjoy a dozen or more advantages
that individuals cannot (for example, fines to corporations are
deductible as business expenses, whereas fines to individuals are not);

** Under most modern corporate charters, corporations have unlimited
lifetimes, giving them a staying power and an ability to accumulate
wealth and strength far beyond anything an individual could ever
achieve. Beyond a certain size, corporations become so large that no
fine --or even the occasional jail sentence for an errant manager --can
deter them from their course. They are simply beyond social control.

** As time has passed, court decisions have given corporations the
legal status of "persons," giving them the same protections that the
first 10 amendments to the Constitution give to natural persons
(individual humans). The first 10 amendments were originally written to
protect individual citizens against a tyrannical government--giving
individuals rights such as "due process" and "free speech."
Corporations have appropriated those rights, which they now use to
influence elections, influence law- making by legislatures, influence
public education, influence the media, influence and "educate" judges,
and influence public policy debates.

Despite these and other advantages of incorporation, the power to give,
or revoke, corporate charters still resides with state legislatures, so
ultimately the American people hold power over American corporations--
though during this century the people have made remarkably little use
of such power. Now CELDF has taken a first step to change this picture.
Here are a few details about the two cases:

WMX Technologies

WMX Technologies (still better known by its former name, Waste
Management, Inc.) is the nation's largest waste hauling firm,
headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois, but chartered in Delaware. In
recent years, WMX has been charged with numerous violations of law and
regulations and has paid tens of millions of dollars in fines. (See
REHW #299, #288, #282, and #281.) Based on this record, CELDF on June
14, 1995, petitioned the Attorney General of Delaware to revoke WMX's
charter of incorporation. Delaware law gives the Attorney General QUO
WARRANTO power to revoke the charter of any corporation for "abuse,
misuse or nonuse of its corporate powers, privileges or franchises."
QUO WARRANTO (a Latin phrase meaning "by what authority?") describes a
proceeding in which the state demands to know by what authority an
individual or corporation is exercising a franchise or liberty. Such a
proceeding can end in revocation of a corporate charter. Thomas Linzey,
the president of CELDF, says Delaware courts have defined "abuse" of
corporate privilege as "continued criminal violations." Linzey says he
does not expect the Delaware Attorney General to take action against
WMX, but eventually he may sue the Attorney General. Delaware law says
the attorney general "shall" take action, Linzey says; it is not


In recent years, CSX spills and leaks have caused pollution in several
U.S. locations (for example, see REHW #230 and NEW YORK TIMES 11/21/91,
pg. A20), including West Virginia. Based on this record, CELDF on June
9, 1995, wrote West Virginia Attorney General Darrell McGraw, Jr.,
seeking the revocation of CSX's corporate charter.

It is clear that there is a new movement afoot in this country to
reassert control over corporations. The action in June by CELDF against
WMX and CSX could be viewed as the opening gambit in a high-stakes
chess game between corporations and the American people. It is a
particularly dangerous game for corporations because, if they use their
raw power to secure their present privileges against democratic
control, they may light the fire under a major public debate, which
would alert the public to the extraordinary nature and extent of
corporate power. In the ensuing conflagration, corporate privileges
could go up in smoke. At present, public attention in the U.S. is
focused almost exclusively on "government" as the source of the
nation's problems; corporations are nearly invisible, and certainly are
nowhere near the center of public debate. Even the mainstream
environmental movement for the past 25 years has sought to influence
corporate behavior only indirectly, by establishing government
regulations--a strategy the mainstream groups continue to pursue even
though it has proven to be enormously costly and largely ineffective.

For the past 4 years, the leading proponent of democratic control of
corporations has been Richard Grossman. Now, with Ward Morehouse,
Grossman has started a new project called the Program on Corporations,
Law and Democracy (P.O. Box 806, Cambridge, Mass., 02140; phone: (508)
487-3151; E-mail: poclad@aol.com). The new project goes beyond mere
charter revocation as a strategy for making corporations more
accountable. Recently Grossman and Morehouse issued a list of
"Suggestions for an Agenda for Action in Arenas WE Define" --tactics
for changing the behavior of corporations, going beyond corporate
charter revocation. Here they are:

** Rechartering corporations to limit their powers and make them
entities subordinate to the sovereign people, by, for example, granting
charters for limited time periods, requiring approval by communities
and workers to continue in existence, making corporate managers and
directors liable for corporate harms, etc.

** Reducing the size of corporations by breaking them up into smaller
units with less power to undermine elections, lawmaking, judicial
proceedings and education; restricting size and capitalization of
corporations; prohibiting one corporation from owning another
corporation (some of which was accomplished by the Public Utility
Holding Company Act of 1935).

** Establishing worker and/or community control over production units
of corporations to protect the "reliance interest" and other rights of
workers and communities. This can be done by writing rules directly
into corporate charters, such as prohibiting the hiring of replacement
workers during strikes, requiring independent health and safety audits
by experts chosen by workers and affected communities, and banning use
of deadly chemicals, such as chlorine.

** Initiating referendum campaigns, or taking action through state
legislatures --and in the courts --to end constitutional protections
for corporate "persons" and to require state attorneys general to
undertake charter revocation or rechartering actions when petitioned by
citizen groups.

** Prohibiting corporations from making campaign contributions to
candidates in ANY elections, and from lobbying ANY local, state and
federal government bodies.

** Stopping extortion and "subsidy abuse" by which large corporations
rake off billions of dollars from human taxpayers through direct pay-
offs and tax breaks.

** Launching campaigns to cap salaries of corporate officials and tie
them to a ratio of average compensation levels of production workers
(say, 5:1 or 10:1), to gain greater transparency in corporate decision-
making, and to end corporate tax deductions for legal fees, advertising
and fines.

** Encouraging worker and community-owned and -controlled cooperatives
and other alternatives to conventional limited liability profit-making
corporations by using law and the public treasury.

** Preparing a model state corporation code based on the principle of
citizen sovereignty and campaigning for its adoption, state-by-state.

** Invigorating from the grassroots up a national debate on the
relationship between public property, private property (including
future value), and the rights of natural persons, communities and other
[non-human] species when they are in conflict, and on the role of the
law in resolving such conflicts in a democracy.

Richard Grossman said recently, "In about 10 states, people are looking
into corporate law and histories --including how their state
constitutions and state corporation codes once defined corporate rights
and activity with great precision. People are learning to demystify the
law, looking for organizing handles they can use to take rights and
powers away from corporations.

"The large corporation is truly the dominant institution of our era. It
creates dependence and feelings of helplessness, while provoking great
anger. Where people have been resisting corporate harms, where
corporations are overtly tyrannical, people ARE reflecting on the
nature of corporations. They ARE discussing citizen sovereignty and
corporate abolition. Surely we can turn people's anger away from the
symbols of government and towards our real governing bodies--giant
corporations. Surely we can build a powerful political movement to
disempower corporations and to govern ourselves," Grossman said.

--Peter Montague


[1] "New Pennsylvania Environmental Group Seeks to Revoke Charters of
CSX Corporation and WMX Technologies for Environmental Transgressions,"
CORPORATE CRIME REPORTER June 26, 1995, pgs. 1-5.

Descriptor terms: corporations; democracy; accountability; wmx; csx;
thomas linzey; de; wv; charter revocation; corporate charters; richard
grossman; ward morehouse; program on corporations, law and democracy;
strategies; tactics; cooperatives;